[inforoots] bits again
Van Snyder
van.snyder at jpl.nasa.gov
Tue Nov 28 10:58:27 PST 2006
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 09:04 -0800, Michael Albaugh wrote:
> Our own 1401 has the interesting
> optional feature that _any_ transfer of control can be a subroutine
> jump.
It's not clear to me whether the read-and-branch etc., stacker-select-
and-branch, or carriage-control-and-branch instructions leave NSI in the
B-address register. It would be useful to test these, and then make
sure simh works the same way as the hardware. I might have asked Heinz
to run these tests at CHM, but if I did, I can't find his reply right
now. I think I did determine that branch-if-word-mark-or-zone does
leave NSI in the B-address register. I'm certain that all the "B" op-
code branches leave NSI in the B-address register (if they branch). I
guess we'll never be able to check branch-if-bit-equal.
--
Van Snyder | What fraction of Americans believe
Van.Snyder at jpl.nasa.gov | Wrestling is real and NASA is fake?
Any alleged opinions are my own and have not been approved or
disapproved by JPL, CalTech, NASA, the President, or anybody else.
More information about the inforoots
mailing list